<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LyX &#8211; the document processor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writtenandread.net/lyx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writtenandread.net/lyx/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LyX &#8211; The Document Processor &#124; Ahuka Communications</title>
		<link>http://writtenandread.net/lyx/comment-page-1/#comment-47240</link>
		<dc:creator>LyX &#8211; The Document Processor &#124; Ahuka Communications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenandread.net/?p=167#comment-47240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Morten Juhl-Johansen Zőlde-Fejér has produced a primer on this which you can read at http://writtenandread.net/lyx/. It looks interesting, check it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morten Juhl-Johansen Zőlde-Fejér has produced a primer on this which you can read at http://writtenandread.net/lyx/. It looks interesting, check it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjjzf</title>
		<link>http://writtenandread.net/lyx/comment-page-1/#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>mjjzf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenandread.net/?p=167#comment-1295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree - I would never recommend LyX to a LaTeX user, unless it was one of the frustrated ones!
I actually find it difficult to get an overview of LaTeX from the code, which is why I am interested in a project like &lt;a href=&quot;http://gummi.midnightcoding.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gummi&lt;/a&gt;, which makes for more easily readable LaTeX editing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree &#8211; I would never recommend LyX to a LaTeX user, unless it was one of the frustrated ones!<br />
I actually find it difficult to get an overview of LaTeX from the code, which is why I am interested in a project like <a href="http://gummi.midnightcoding.org/" rel="nofollow">Gummi</a>, which makes for more easily readable LaTeX editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frakturfreund</title>
		<link>http://writtenandread.net/lyx/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>Frakturfreund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenandread.net/?p=167#comment-1294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your great review!

My opinion about LyX: On the one hand, it ſeems to be a great way to bring many advantages of the TeX backend, especially the idea of logical markup, to ‘normal’ WYSIWYG uſers. On the other hand, the produced &lt;code&gt;.lyx&lt;/code&gt; file looks more or less like PlainTeX, which feels for me as a LaTeX uſer a litle bit bloated (or at least unfamiliar) since i prefer even shorter ’code’ (like writing &lt;code&gt;•&lt;/code&gt; inſtead &lt;code&gt;\item&lt;/code&gt; with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://github.com/alt/alttex&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;alttex&lt;/a&gt; package)—but for Lyx to the rescue, the LaTeX export ſeems uſeable.

So all in all, i’m not ſure if one ſhould recommend LyX to a existing La/Con/whatever-TeX uſer, but for someone from the WYSIWYG world who’s ſcared of learning the totally different “writing source code” approach of TeX, it’s a really nice, uſe- and powerfull alternative to get “the beſt of both worlds”.

Finally a ſmall hint: There’s even a own &lt;a href=&quot;https://identi.ca/group/lyx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lyx group at identi.ca&lt;/a&gt;, as i was recently told by ſomeone ;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your great review!</p>
<p>My opinion about LyX: On the one hand, it ſeems to be a great way to bring many advantages of the TeX backend, especially the idea of logical markup, to ‘normal’ WYSIWYG uſers. On the other hand, the produced <code>.lyx</code> file looks more or less like PlainTeX, which feels for me as a LaTeX uſer a litle bit bloated (or at least unfamiliar) since i prefer even shorter ’code’ (like writing <code>•</code> inſtead <code>\item</code> with the <a href="http://github.com/alt/alttex" rel="nofollow">alttex</a> package)—but for Lyx to the rescue, the LaTeX export ſeems uſeable.</p>
<p>So all in all, i’m not ſure if one ſhould recommend LyX to a existing La/Con/whatever-TeX uſer, but for someone from the WYSIWYG world who’s ſcared of learning the totally different “writing source code” approach of TeX, it’s a really nice, uſe- and powerfull alternative to get “the beſt of both worlds”.</p>
<p>Finally a ſmall hint: There’s even a own <a href="https://identi.ca/group/lyx" rel="nofollow">lyx group at identi.ca</a>, as i was recently told by ſomeone <img src='http://writtenandread.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjjzf</title>
		<link>http://writtenandread.net/lyx/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>mjjzf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenandread.net/?p=167#comment-930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to see it can be of use to you. In case you didn&#039;t see it, like you I actually did a writeup on Jabref.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see it can be of use to you. In case you didn&#8217;t see it, like you I actually did a writeup on Jabref.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burrA</title>
		<link>http://writtenandread.net/lyx/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>burrA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenandread.net/?p=167#comment-928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot. This is of great help to technological noobs like me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot. This is of great help to technological noobs like me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sandahl</title>
		<link>http://writtenandread.net/lyx/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sandahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenandread.net/?p=167#comment-239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been awhile since I used Lyx last, but this post helped remind me how useful it is, and how powerful it is when it comes to organizing a large document.  I have used it when writing a book, and keeping track of chapters as well as annotations is much easier than with a word processing program.  As I am back in school writing research papers I will be reinstalling Lyx to help the process.  Thanks for the reminder of this great program.

By the way it also runs great on Windows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been awhile since I used Lyx last, but this post helped remind me how useful it is, and how powerful it is when it comes to organizing a large document.  I have used it when writing a book, and keeping track of chapters as well as annotations is much easier than with a word processing program.  As I am back in school writing research papers I will be reinstalling Lyx to help the process.  Thanks for the reminder of this great program.</p>
<p>By the way it also runs great on Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
